Facebook Linkedin Youtube X-twitter Instagram
Professional Syndicates Complex, Sharif Abdel Hamid Sharaf Street, 31, Amman, Jordan
About Jordan
  • Home
  • Membership
    • Membership Request
    • Associate Members
    • Types of memberships
    • General Payment Service via Cliq
  • Activity
    • Lectures and conferences
  • Health Education
  • Scientific materials
  • Gallary
    • Videos
    • Photos
  • About US
  • Contact us
  • English
Login
  • Home
  • Membership
    • Membership Request
    • Associate Members
    • Types of memberships
    • General Payment Service via Cliq
  • Activity
    • Lectures and conferences
  • Health Education
  • Scientific materials
  • Gallary
    • Videos
    • Photos
  • About US
  • Contact us
  • English
  • من نحن
    • تاريخ الجمعية
    • هيكل الجمعية
    • ادارة الجمعية
    • تطوع معنا
  • العضوية
    • طلب انتساب
    • الاعضاء المنتسبون
    • Types of memberships in the Society of Cardiologists
  • Home
  • نشاطات
  • مواد علمية
  • Health Education
  • جاليري
    • فيديو
    • صور
  • اتصل بنا
Uncategorized
jordan heart September 30, 2025 0

Cardiogenic Shock 2024–2025 — Keynotes from Global Guidelines

Cardiogenic Shock 2024–2025 — Keynotes from Global Guidelines
The most recent international updates on the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) are drawn from the ACC/AHA Clinical Guidance 2025, ISHLT Consensus 2024, the ESC ACS Update 2023, and the SCAI Shock Staging Framework 2022
Keynotes:
1. Levels of Care (AHA/ACC – Heart Failure Centers Framework, adapted for Shock Care)
• Level 1 – Foundation / Basic:
• Provides only initial stabilization (fluids, vasopressors, inotropes).
• Basic monitoring and referral pathways.
• Level 2 – Advanced:
• PCI-capable hospital and short-term possible MCS = Mechanical Circulatory Support devices (IABP, Impella, TandemHeart).
• Can perform emergency revascularization and temporary circulatory support.
• No durable LVAD or transplant programs.
• Level 3 – Comprehensive / Hub:
• High-volume referral center.
• Full advanced therapies: durable LVAD, BiVAD, heart transplantation.
• 24/7 multidisciplinary “Shock Team” (cardiology, cardiac surgery, ICU, perfusion).
• Research and training integrated.
2. ISHLT Consensus (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation)
2024 – Key Messages:
• Cardiogenic shock exists on a continuum, classified by the SCAI stages A–E.
• Stage A: At risk – patient has acute coronary syndrome or decompensated HF but no shock yet.
• Stage B: Beginning – early signs of shock (mild hypotension, tachycardia).
• Stage C: Classic – clear hypotension with hypoperfusion (cold extremities, oliguria, high lactate).
• Stage D: Deteriorating – worsening shock despite fluids, vasopressors, or inotropes.
• Stage E: Extremis – circulatory collapse or cardiac arrest.
Treatment intensity must match severity: simple support in early stages, escalating to advanced therapies and MCS in later stages.
• Checklists before transfer (vitals, labs, echo, therapies, shock stage) save critical time.
• End-organ perfusion (brain, kidney, liver) is the ultimate therapeutic goal—not a fixed blood Bp target.
• Anticoagulation with temporary MCS must be individualized:
• Impella: continuous heparin flush through the device + systemic anticoagulation.
• ECMO: continuous IV heparin with ACT/aPTT monitoring.
• Timing: highest thrombus risk during the first 24–48 hours after device insertion.
3. ACC/AHA 2025 Guidelines — ACS and Cardiogenic Shock
STEMI (ST-elevation MI)
• Immediate transfer to a PCI-capable hospital (Class I,B).
• Primary PCI is recommended irrespective of symptom duration if cardiogenic shock or ongoing ischemia is present (Class I, ,B)
• CABG if PCI is not feasible (Class I  ,B)
• Fibrinolysis if neither PCI nor CABG is available (Class I,  😎
• Beta blockers contraindicated in shock.
• IABP: Routine use not recommended; selective use may be considered if the patient does not stabilize with drugs and no other temporary advanced MCS (Impella, TandemHeart, VA-ECMO) is available.
• In many Level 1–2 centers, IABP remains the only feasible bridge until transfer to a Level 3 hub.
• Durable LVADs are not acute rescue devices; they are for long-term MCS or bridge-to-transplant strategies.
NSTEMI (Non-ST-elevation MI)
• Less frequent association with shock compared to STEMI, but equally critical.
• Early invasive strategy with revascularization is recommended (Class I ,B).
• Beta blockers contraindicated when shock risk is present.
• IABP may be reasonable in refractory shock if other options are not available (Class IIa, C).
CCS (Chronic Coronary Syndromes)
• Cardiogenic shock in CCS is rare.
• When it occurs, it is usually due to a superimposed acute event, such as:
• New myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI).
• Mechanical complication (acute MR from papillary muscle rupture, VSD, free wall rupture).
• Severe arrhythmias or decompensation in advanced LV dysfunction.
• In such cases, patients should be managed as ACS with shock until proven otherwise.
• Urgent ECG, echocardiography, and transfer to a PCI-capable center are essential.
Key Point:
• STEMI & NSTEMI with shock → require immediate revascularization and tailored MCS support.
• CCS with shock → almost always reflects an acute transition to ACS or a complication, so it must be managed as ACS.
4. ESC 2023 ACS Guidelines — Cardiogenic Shock
• Routine IABP not recommended (Class III)
• Short-term MCS may be considered in refractory shock (Class IIb, C).
• Priorities:
• Rapid transfer to a center with cath lab (for PCI capability).
• Immediate ECG and echocardiography.
• Continuous ECG and invasive BP monitoring.
• Coronary angiography as soon as possible (in shock: immediate, not bound to 90 minutes only).
• Fluids: only if no pulmonary congestion.
• Dobutamine: for low cardiac output when SBP ≥85–90 mmHg.
• Norepinephrine: preferred vasopressor if SBP <85 mmHg or persistent hypoperfusion.
• Dopamine discouraged due to risk of arrhythmias.
5.MCS Expert Consensus (SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS 2015)
• IABP and ECMO were historical first-line devices.
• Impella and TandemHeart provide stronger hemodynamic support than IABP.
• Early MCS placement should be considered if no improvement with initial drugs.
• VA-ECMO supports both circulation and oxygenation; useful when shock + respiratory failure coexist.
• Right ventricular shock may need targeted RV support.
6. ISHLT (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation) 2024 — Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) Guidance:
• Durable LVAD indicated if:
• Ventricular function unrecoverable.
• Failure to wean from temporary MCS/inotropes.
• End-organ recovery possible.
• No irreversible organ damage.
7. Pharmacologic Management
• Vasopressors: norepinephrine is first-line; avoid dopamine.
• Inotropes: dobutamine or milrinone if low cardiac output.
• Vasodilators: IV nitroglycerin (avoid in hypotension).
• Antiplatelets: aspirin early in ACS/shock.
• Analgesia: morphine reduces pain and sympathetic stress.
• Diuretics: furosemide if pulmonary congestion present.
• Other: nesiritide possible but hypotension risk limits use.
Key Takeaway :
• Levels of Care (1–3, AHA): Level 3 centers provide the highest, most comprehensive therapy including LVAD and transplant.
• Early revascularization (PCI/CABG) remains cornerstone therapy.
• Norepinephrine is the preferred vasopressor; dopamine discouraged.
• Routine IABP no longer recommended; use modern MCS (Impella, ECMO) early if shock persists.
• Focus on end-organ perfusion, not just blood pressure.
• Multidisciplinary shock teams and systematic transfer to higher levels are essential for survival.
76 Views
8
International Standards for Centers of Excellence in Heart Failure and Heart TransplantationSeptember 30, 2025
Mavacamten-Evidence in Obstructive vs. Nonobstructive HCMOctober 1, 2025

مقالات ذات صلة

Uncategorized

“Your Heart May Be Older Than You Think” (Medscape Medical News, July 30, 2025):

jordan heart August 3, 2025
Uncategorized

Summary: “Time to Change the Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy?”

webadmin May 5, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

احدث المقالات

  • ESC Leads Push for Stronger CE-Mark Evidence on High-Risk Devices
  • TAVR(TAVI in Europe)vs. SAVR —  Cardiologists, heart surgeons sound alarm over widespread use of TAVR in low-risk patients
  • Pediatric Cardiology: The LEAD Initiative — Universal Cholesterol Screening in Children Can Save Lives
  • Vericiguat in Heart Failure – VICTORIA vs VICTOR (ESC 2025)
  • Aspirin and Cancer Prevention

فئات

  • Health Education
  • Previous lectures and conferences
  • Uncategorized

Jordanian Cardiology Society

Jordanian Cardiology Society

Amman-Jordan

00962795001983

Working hours

From Sunday to Thursday

From nine in the morning until four in the afternoon

Important Links

Jordanian Cardiology Society

Research and studies

Medical articles

Login

Privacy Policy

Refund Policy

Cancellation Policy

Delivery Policy

Association Location

Copyright © 2024 Jordanian Cardiologists Association by WebAppRoots. All Rights Reserved.